31.8 C
Wednesday, October 21, 2020

CAA Violence-Accused Named and Shamed On Yogi Adityanath’s Orders

Hoardings were put up in Lucknow with details of the CAA violence-accused. Hoardings of CAA violence-accused, with names, addresses, in Lucknow. Those named asked to pay compensation for damage to public property. Hoardings say if they fail to pay up soon, property will be attached

Must read

Stay music scene to assist Vic’s financial restoration

The worth of Melbourne’s dwell music scene to Victoria’s financial system must recognised so it could assist with the subsequent part of restoration...

ACT election 2020: Labor on observe for a sixth time period in parliament

Outcomes from the ACT election are beginning to movement because of digital voting. Half an hour after polling cubicles closed on Saturday, virtually...
The Indian Telegraphhttps://theindiantelegraph.com.au/
Established in 2007, The Indian Telegraph is a multi award winning digital media company based in Australia.

Lucknow: The Uttar Pradesh government  has put up hoardings in prominent intersections in state capital Lucknow, with names, addresses and photos of some of those accused of violence during protests against the citizenship law in Lucknow in December last year. The people named on the hoardings have been asked to pay up compensation for damage to public property in Lucknow during the violence, in which one person died. The hoardings say if the accused fail to pay up soon, their property will be attached.

It is not clear why public hoardings with names and addresses have been put up; individual property attachment notices to many of the accused have already been served by the government. Among those named in the hoardings are activist-politician Sadaf Jafar, lawyer Mohammed Shoaib , theatre personality Deepak Kabir and former IPS officer SR Darapuri. All of these people are out on bail and have said they will contest in court any move by the government to attach their property.

In many bail orders, courts have noted that the police failed to back up their claims about the accused with enough evidence to deny bail.

The hoardings in Lucknow say if the accused fail to pay up soon, their property will be attached.

In February, the Allahabad High Court stayed a similar property attachment notice given by the government  to a man in Kanpur, for his alleged role in destruction of government property in large-scale violence over the Citizenship (Amendment) Act or CAA in the city in December . The high court provided interim protection to the accused saying that the Supreme Court was already looking into the validity of such notices in a separate case.

A source in the Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister’s office said the hoardings in Lucknow were put up on the instructions of Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath. After the December violence, Yogi Adityanath had courted controversy with his remarks about ‘badla’ or revenge . “We will be very strict. I am monitoring this myself. We will attach the property of all those involved in the violence and many such faces are identified in videography and CCTVs. We will attach their property and take revenge against them ,” the Chief Minister had said.

Large-scale violence had broken out in Uttar Pradesh in December after protests against the citizenship law turned violent in many places. As part of a crackdown, UP Police arrested thousands of people across violence-hit districts and brought serious charges like rioting and attempted murder against them. The police claimed at least 60 of their personnel had bullet injuries across the state while trying to control mobs that were indulging in vandalism, arson and firing.

But many questions have since been raised on the police action, including how the police in many areas seem to have indulged in excesses in dealing with the situation.

In the last week of January, a court in west Uttar Pradesh’s Bijnor granted bail to 48 people accused by the state police of rioting and attempted murder during the December violence. The presiding judge made some scathing observations against police investigations in the case. In his bail order, the judge said, “The police FIR says the mob fired at the cops, but no evidence has been presented in court to show any recovery of weapons. The government lawyers have failed to produce any evidence in court that shows that anyone part of the mob fired at the police.”

Source link

Latest article

Sam Burgess: Attorneys for Phoebe Burgess hit again at NRL star

The bitter court docket feud between Sam Burgess and his estranged spouse has escalated with Phoebe Burgess’s attorneys hitting again on the former...

Greater than 1600 register for ‘stolen wages’ class motion towards WA authorities

Greater than 1600 indigenous folks, a lot of whom have been taken from their households as youngsters, have thus far registered their curiosity...

ABC managing director calls Laura Tingle tweet ‘error in judgment’

A prime ABC boss has referred to as a journalist’s politically-charged tweet blasting Scott Morrison an “error in judgment”.Laura Tingle, chief political correspondent...

Cricket: Cameron Inexperienced made 185 in a shocking efficiency for WA which has him firmly on the Check radar

Measure Cameron Inexperienced up for a dishevelled inexperienced cap, he could possibly be sporting one as quickly as December. The “it boy” of...

Clive Palmer: Tornado Sister sue over marketing campaign advertisements

The nationwide director of the United Australia Get together has admitted it was “deceptive” to inform a report label Clive Palmer was a...