India

Dera chief filed 30 pleas in HC against trial court orders

Dera chief filed 30 pleas in HC against trial court orders

The High Court, in one of its orders on July 5, even took strong note of this and recorded that it was an attempt to “prolong the trial” and directed the Special CBI Judge to conclude the trial at the earliest.

Every three months since charges were framed against rape convict Gurmeet Ram Rahim in September 2008, he filed a review petition against the trial court orders in the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The High Court, in one of its orders on July 5, even took strong note of this and recorded that it was an attempt to “prolong the trial” and directed the Special CBI Judge to conclude the trial at the earliest.

The Dera head moved more than 30 applications under various provisions of criminal law, seeking direction or revision of the trial court orders before the high court after September 2008, when the CBI court took over the case. Most of them were, however, dismissed, with the last one being on August 3. They mostly pertained to the examination of the victim’s handwriting or the witnesses in the case. Six petitions were filed this year alone, till August, as the trial in the court reached the final stage.

“The apparent motive of the petitioner, as manifested, is to prolong the trial which is pending for the last nine years, and after conclusion of prosecution evidence in the year 2013, for defence evidence for the last four years,” said Justice Surinder Gupta in his judgment on a plea challenging a CBI court order on July 5. “The trial court is directed to conclude the trial which is at the final stage, at earliest. Copy of this order be conveyed to the trial court,” the judge added.

On Monday, the trial court will pronounce the quantum of sentence in the case and, according to the legal experts, the self-styled godman, who now stands convicted under Section 376 (rape) and Section 506 (criminal intimidation), is likely to face a punishment of at least seven years or even more depending on the circumstances of the crime.

Maximum punishment in the case can be life imprisonment. The only door for any relief to him is the same High Court — which set the law in motion in 2002 on the case on basis of an anonymous complaint, and where his conduct of prolonging the trial is a matter of record.

Online Source: The Indian Express

India

More in India

Break the Silence, End the Violence

Vish ViswanathanMay 2, 2018

The Sky Isn’t The Limit For India’s Rocket Women

Susheela SrinivasMay 2, 2018

Australia India Youth Dialogue: Going Beyond The Clichéd Cs

Arijit BanerjiMay 2, 2018

Meet The Indian Power Puff Girls Of Sydney

Jyotsna SharmaMay 2, 2018

Western Sydney Poised To Benefit From NSW Premier’s India Visit

Vish ViswanathanApril 17, 2018

Let’s Take Yoga To Work

Susheela SrinivasApril 12, 2018

Australia India Youth Dialogue Strengthens Bilateral Ties

Scott FarlowApril 12, 2018

Akki’s Selfie With Suniel Shetty Takes Us Back To The Good Old Days

The Indian TelegraphApril 3, 2018

Classical Delights For Dance Lovers

Vish ViswanathanMarch 20, 2018

“They Made Me Feel Worthless”

Aarti Kapur SinghMarch 20, 2018

Love For Love’s Sake

Twinkle GhoshMarch 6, 2018

Bollywood Gupshup

Aarti Kapur SinghMarch 6, 2018

Sri ‘Diva’ No more

Aarti Kapur SinghMarch 6, 2018

Bollywood’s First Female Superstar Sridevi Passes Away at 54

The Indian TelegraphFebruary 25, 2018

From Baahubali to Butter Chicken: Prabhas Unplugged

Aarti Kapur SinghFebruary 20, 2018

The Curious Case Of Anant Ambani

Twinkle GhoshFebruary 20, 2018

Time for a “SAVE ADANI” yet?

Vish ViswanathanFebruary 7, 2018

Bollywood Gupshup

Aarti Kapur SinghFebruary 6, 2018

Tadasana: Be As Sturdy As A Mountain

Susheela SrinivasFebruary 6, 2018

Is Our National Flag Original?

Arjun PadleFebruary 6, 2018

Endgame Adani Or Far From It?

Shivani SinghalFebruary 6, 2018